1.Prepositions with people: mit wem? an wen?
When a German preposition refers to a person, questions are usually built with the preposition plus wen or wem: mit wem?, an wen?, für wen?, von wem?. This is different from questions about things and situations, where German often uses wo(r)- forms such as womit?, woran?, and worauf?.
At A2 this distinction becomes especially important because many common verbs are learned as fixed units: sprechen mit + dat., denken an + acc., warten auf + acc., sich kümmern um + acc.. The preposition determines the case, and the question must keep that same preposition.
2.The core rule: keep the preposition
If a verb or expression uses a preposition, the same preposition stays in the question. So the pattern is not simply wer? / wen? / wem?. It is often preposition + wen / wem.
3.People vs things: the central A2 contrast
For a person, German normally asks with wen / wem after the preposition. For a thing, topic, or situation, German often uses a wo(r)- question.
| Meaning | Person | Thing / situation |
|---|---|---|
| with | mit wem? | womit? |
| about / of | von wem? | wovon? |
| at / with | bei wem? | wobei? |
| to / toward | an wen? | woran? |
| for | für wen? | wofür? |
| waiting for | auf wen? | worauf? |
| about | über wen? | worüber? |
4.First decide the preposition, then the case
The case does not come from the person. It comes from the preposition or the verb-preposition pattern: mit + dat. → mit meiner Kollegin → mit wem?; von + dat. → von meinem Chef → von wem?; an + acc. in denken an → an meinen Freund → an wen?; auf + acc. in warten auf → auf die Ärztin → auf wen?. This is why learning the whole unit is more reliable than memorizing the verb alone.
5.Dative questions: preposition + wem
Several very common prepositions require dative. When they refer to a person, the question word is wem. Useful formula: dative preposition + person → preposition + wem?.
6.mit + dative: togetherness, cooperation, and communication
mit always takes dative. With people it often expresses togetherness, contact, or cooperation. For a thing, compare Womit fährst du zur Arbeit? — Ich fahre mit dem Bus.
7.von + dative: source, sender, connection with a person
With people, von + dat. often marks a source, sender, author, or the person something comes from. For things and topics, wovon? is often used.
8.bei + dative: at someone’s place, with a person or organisation
bei takes dative. With people it often means being at someone’s place, living with someone, or contact with a professional. Remember: beim = bei dem.
9.zu + dative: direction towards a person
zu takes dative and is very common when the goal of movement is a person or an institution. Frequent contractions: zum = zu dem, zur = zu der.
10.nach + dative in fragen nach
The fixed pattern fragen nach + dat. means asking about someone or something, or looking for someone by asking. You cannot replace nach with another preposition just because a person follows.
11.vor + dative with fear and protection
In expressions such as Angst haben vor and sich fürchten vor, the preposition vor is used with dative. The same pattern applies: vor + dat. → vor wem?.
12.Accusative questions: preposition + wen
Many fixed verb-preposition patterns take accusative. When a person is meant, the question word is wen. Useful formula: accusative preposition + person → preposition + wen?.
13.an + accusative in denken an
The fixed pattern denken an + acc. means thinking of someone or something. For a thing or situation, use Woran denkst du?.
14.auf + accusative in warten auf
warten auf + acc. is another important fixed construction. For things: Worauf wartest du? — Ich warte auf den Bus.
15.für + accusative: recipient or the person something is done for
für always takes accusative. With people it often marks the addressee, the beneficiary, or the person something is intended for. For purpose or a thing, compare wofür?.
16.über + accusative: speaking or thinking about a person
über + acc. often appears with sprechen über, reden über, sich ärgern über. For a topic or thing: Worüber sprecht ihr?.
17.um + accusative in sich kümmern um
The fixed pattern sich kümmern um + acc. means looking after someone or dealing with something. For a matter or thing, worum? is normally used.
18.gegen + accusative with people and opponents
gegen takes accusative. With people it is often used when someone is an opponent or an action is directed against someone. For abstract things, wogegen? is possible.
19.Personal pronouns after dative prepositions
If the person is already known, a personal pronoun is natural. After a dative preposition the pronoun is also in the dative.
| Nominative | Dative after the preposition |
|---|---|
ich | mir |
du | dir |
er | ihm |
sie | ihr |
wir | uns |
ihr | euch |
sie | ihnen |
Sie | Ihnen |
20.Personal pronouns after accusative prepositions
After an accusative preposition the personal pronoun is used in the accusative.
| Nominative | Accusative after the preposition |
|---|---|
ich | mich |
du | dich |
er | ihn |
sie | sie |
wir | uns |
ihr | euch |
sie | sie |
Sie | Sie |
21.Why mit wem?, but an wen?
The choice between wem and wen depends on the case required by the preposition or fixed construction. The most reliable method is to learn the construction together with its case.
| Pattern | Question |
|---|---|
mit + dat. | mit wem? |
bei + dat. | bei wem? |
von + dat. | von wem? |
zu + dat. | zu wem? |
denken an + acc. | an wen? |
warten auf + acc. | auf wen? |
für + acc. | für wen? |
um + acc. | um wen? |
22.Person question and thing question: pairs
These pairs show the system clearly.
23.For people, do not use wo(r)- as the basic model
At A2 it is useful to keep a clear rule: if the question is about a person, use preposition + wen / wem. The wo(r)- system is mainly used in parallel for things, topics, events, and situations.
Not womit / woran / worauf if a person is expected.
24.Word order in the direct question
The prepositional question group normally stands first, followed by the conjugated verb. Pattern: preposition + wen / wem | conjugated verb | subject | … ? The preposition and wen / wem form one question block.
25.The same constructions in a subordinate clause
The prepositional group keeps its case in a subordinate clause as well. Only the verb position changes according to the Nebensatz rule. This topic therefore connects directly with A2 indirect questions and subordinate clauses.
26.Learn verb + preposition as one unit
Do not memorize only warten, denken, sprechen, or sich kümmern. It is better to learn the full pattern. The preposition is part of the grammar of the whole expression.
| Pattern | Example |
|---|---|
warten auf + acc. | Ich warte auf meinen Freund. |
denken an + acc. | Ich denke an meine Mutter. |
sprechen mit + dat. | Ich spreche mit meiner Kollegin. |
sprechen über + acc. | Ich spreche über meinen Kollegen. |
sich kümmern um + acc. | Ich kümmere mich um die Kinder. |
Angst haben vor + dat. | Sie hat Angst vor ihrem Chef. |
fragen nach + dat. | Jemand hat nach dir gefragt. |
27.The same verb can take different prepositions
One and the same verb can combine with different prepositions and meanings. The question must match the construction actually used. So there is not always a single “verb preposition”: the combination may depend on the meaning.
28.Typical mistakes
| Mistake type | Wrong | Correct |
|---|---|---|
wer instead of a preposition question | Wer sprichst du mit? | Mit wem sprichst du? |
wo(r)- for a person question | Worauf wartest du? → Auf Maria. | Auf wen wartest du? |
| wrong case after the preposition | mit ihn, für ihm | mit ihm, für ihn |
| dropping the required preposition | Wen wartest du? | Auf wen wartest du? |
29.Practical choice algorithm
If you need to ask about a person after a preposition construction:
- Identify the whole pattern:
warten auf,sprechen mit,denken an. - Keep the preposition.
- Identify the case of that pattern.
- Dative →
wem; accusative →wen. - Put the whole question group at the beginning:
mit wem?/auf wen?/an wen?.
If the question is about a thing or situation, use the matching wo(r)- form with a suitable construction.